Saginaw vs. Sarnia 3-5-08

[hockeyfollower]

DJ Your attempt at humour has me puzzled, but I will try to slow down my explanation for you, maybe patterning isn't your strong suit.
It seems TW pulls the goalies when the score reaches 4--0. With the exception of the Plymouth game when it was 3-0 after 1, but like I said he may not have liked the 3rd goal from center or perhaps TW and EP came to the conclusion that he wasnt back to his game shape.
RD game against Sarnia never reached 4-0.
Just thought I saw a pattern in the coaches decision, not saying that is his operating method, but just a pattern in the 3 games EP has been pulled.
As for the bank I would keep running.

[acwright84]

I also think it should somewhat be based on the type of goals being given not just how many don't you agree.

[hockeyfollower]

Without a doubt it shouldn't be just a number of goals ,but the type of goals as well. However everyone has an opinion on what is a weak goal ,but the only person who matters is the coach.
What we see in the stands may not be what the coach sees. For example you can't tell if the goalies are screened or if the puck changed directions all the time. Ice level is different.
I only put forth a theory on changing goalies. Coaches change goalies to sometimes hope to change the momentum, not really based on the goalies play.
Like I said in an earlier post I found it interesting that TW started his perceived 4th line to start the 2nd period against Sarnia's 1st line. That to me shows his displeasure with the whole team not just 1 individual