|
|
Post by jrp0629 on Nov 12, 2008 19:18:12 GMT -5
Any news on him? I think he is recovering from injury correct? Any word when he is expected to return?  |
|
|
|
Post by ohlfan06 on Nov 12, 2008 19:40:27 GMT -5
I heard possibly this weekend, if not next weekend.
|
|
|
|
Post by MidlandSpiritFan on Nov 12, 2008 19:43:25 GMT -5
If he plays, who sits??
|
|
|
|
Post by ohlfan06 on Nov 12, 2008 19:48:19 GMT -5
Possibly Sanderson? I'm not sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by jrp0629 on Nov 12, 2008 20:22:19 GMT -5
I don't really see Sanderson sitting. Does anyone else?
|
|
|
|
Post by sagdude on Nov 12, 2008 20:30:02 GMT -5
I could see Kavanagh, Jurusek, or Fillman sitting before Sanderson would.
|
|
|
|
Post by donjohnson on Nov 12, 2008 21:00:54 GMT -5
agree with you sagdude
|
|
|
|
Post by mievl on Nov 12, 2008 23:35:19 GMT -5
my money is on fillman.
|
|
|
|
Post by sensspiritfan on Nov 13, 2008 7:16:33 GMT -5
Daniel is just coming back from a major injury and probably has not done a lot of skating or is not likely in game shape so I would be surprised if he comes back and is inserted right back into the lineup -- but I've been surprised before.
|
|
|
|
Post by sagdude on Nov 13, 2008 8:41:38 GMT -5
I would think that we will see him slowly work his way back into a regular role. Probably a few games on the 4th line and will be worked into the healthy scratch rotation, maybe for the first month or couple weeks. And if all goes well a more permanent spot on the 3rd line, possibly 2nd line if his knee is 100%. I can't see Watson moving Pleckatis or Murovich off the 2nd line so my guess is that he will be battleing Sanderson for a spot on the 2nd line. Ofcourse things may change depending on the outcome of the Swartz "slew foot" review. Which in my opinion and what I could see from the cat walk was a good clean hit. If we lose Swartz a number of games.....who moves to the #1 line?
|
|
|
|
Post by donjohnson on Nov 13, 2008 9:02:27 GMT -5
I would guess that if there's a suspension it will be Skellet, Combs, Chappell.
It will be interesting to see how Pachis will mesh with the guys that are playing so well right now...i really liked his progress at the end of last year so hopefully a year under his belt will make him stronger with the puck and he'll turn into a solid contributor
|
|
|
|
Post by sagdude on Nov 13, 2008 12:37:20 GMT -5
my bad. Swartz is on the 2nd line. So if Swartz is suspended does Sanderson, Plekatis, or bochek move up and Pachis fills a spot on the 3rd line?
|
|
|
|
Post by donjohnson on Nov 13, 2008 14:26:01 GMT -5
sanderson moves up...pleckatis is alread on the 2nd line...just a recap on lines for everyone (i may be wrong on 3rd/4th)
1) Chappell - Combs - Skellet
2) Szwarz - Murovich - Pleckatis
3) Svoboda - Sanderson - Jarusek
4) Allicock - Bocheck - Fillman
I would expect Pachis to begin on a wing with Allicock and Bocheck and eventually move up with Sanderson and Svoboda...that would put Jarusek or Fillman on the pine depending on play. I do like what Fillman has been doing lately so I would guess Jarusek sits for a while.
|
|
|
|
Post by eaglei12 on Nov 13, 2008 15:30:09 GMT -5
1) Chappell - Combs - Skellet
2) Szwarz - Murovich - Pleckatis
3) Allicock - Bochek - Sanderson
4) Svoboda - Kavanaugh - Fillman - Jarusek
My guess is Pachis plays the 4th line and possibly moves to the 3rd with Allicock and Bochek who seem to work well together. Svoboda played 3rd line when allicock was suspended.
|
|
|
|
Post by donjohnson on Nov 13, 2008 16:33:56 GMT -5
1) Chappell - Combs - Skellet 2) Szwarz - Murovich - Pleckatis 3) Allicock - Bochek - Sanderson 4) Svoboda - Kavanaugh - Fillman - Jarusek My guess is Pachis plays the 4th line and possibly moves to the 3rd with Allicock and Bochek who seem to work well together. Svoboda played 3rd line when allicock was suspended. where do you have Sanderson? Although he's not scoring right now, he's still more experienced and a much better player than Allicock, Bocheck and Pachis. Also, are you sure about your lines...i thought I was pretty right on with mine but like I said, 3rd/4th may be wrong |
|
